• Version
• Download 9
• File Size 328.77 KB
• File Count 1
• Create Date 5 July 2025
• Last Updated 5 July 2025

The Role, Functioning, and Contemporary Challenges of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in International Dispute Settlement

Ms Sheetal Sharma

Assistant Professor ipem Law Academy

Ms Reshu Tyagi

Assistant professor

Ipem Group of Institutions Management

Abstract

Established in 1899, the Permanent Tribunal of Arbitration (PCA) is crucial to the mutually beneficial resolution of international conflicts. The PCA offers an adaptable and readily available institutional framework for arbitrators as well as other dispute resolution procedures, even though it does not constitute a court in the traditional sense of the word. In addition to assessing the PCA's present challenges, such as issues with credibility, conformity, and international inspirations, this article analyzes the corporation's organizational framework, organizational working properly, and administrative procedures. A unique position in the framework of global law is held by the International Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA). It offers an adaptable, arranged structure to facilitate managing the operation of mediation along with other types of dispute resolution, although lacking having the standard judicial functions of a court, such as has mandatory competence or an ongoing bench for delivering decisions. Because of its adaptability, the PCA can be utilized on an array of problems, such as across state lines, investor-state, and environmentalist conflicts, by governments, international organizations, and private organizations. In along with providing administrative assistance, arbitrator appointments, and individually tailored rules, the PCA's operational architecture upholds scientific knowledge and institutionalized truthfulness. In order to understand how the PCA supports international disagree settlement, this investigation aims to analyze its institutional framework, operational procedures, and administration practices. It examines the role of participating nations and arbitrators, the Global Bureau's makeup and operations, and the administrative independence granted to contending participants. In additional to this organizational evaluation, the paper objectively analyzes a number of current issues confronting the PCA, the most prominent of which are problems of trustworthiness, the implementation of arbitral awards, and the increasing influence of global pressures on the organization's functioning. The fragmentation of dispute resolution forums, the strategic actions of powerful states, and the conflict between public accountability and confidentiality are all issues that are reflected in international law.

For the purpose of to further strengthen the PCA's accessibility and performance in a disconnected multinational judiciary, the article concluded with reform suggestions.